By: Greeysis
Cross In RD is common when a friend comes to travel abroad, returning with a gift for those close to them, was how a colleague after to spend their holiday in Europe to give me the book "Inside Web Wikileaks world's most dangerous."
The book personally contains 250 pages of easy reading, particularly because its content describes the website Wikileaks editor Julian Assange and in the last two years have attracted the attention of the international press.
Yet, I finish reading it with a feeling of heaviness after learning the intricacies of the relationship between Julian Assange and the author of the book Domscheit-Berg for his "discrepancies excess Assange control and role of" demystifying a different Julian to as known in the media, at least in Latin America.
's no secret that labor relations are not easy to handle when personal egos are not controlled, particularly in pressure environments and powers as in the media.
Personally I had to survive all attacks and speculation during my short career, however, I have found that the time is responsible for putting each person in place and to clarify the situations were not handled properly.
What catches my attention Domscheit-Berg or Daniel Schmitt, "is the negative charge of energy transmitted by the book as he describes the attitudes and personality as Assange Wikileaks reveals that all is not what we wanted.
understand your need to vent, to reflect, to share with the public the truth about the security of the site and promote their project Openleaks. But this book, moves away from the concept literature, what is journalism, what is information. "This book is not it? Just gives me a lot of data under the guise of a feeling of hatred and resentment.
Like most "books" that are now published an advertising project seems "crude" that was launched at the juncture of the crisis of Wikileaks after the publications of the American diplomatic cables and submission to the Julian Assange justice.
Nevertheless, German-Berg Domscheit reveals interesting facts about foreign policy and management Wikileaks. Described by major media as "the new technology journalism." But according to the author was led by an egomaniac without scruples or ethics when it comes to managing the information received.
The author reveals the unthinkable for me: Wikileaks always lacked a reliable system for protection of sources and a structure to process thousands of documents he received. Describes the Web According
operated as follows: a source hangs his documents, Wikileaks team cleans metadata, check shipments and accompanying notes drawn on the text.
At first this did Assange Domscheit and although publicly declared that they had thousands of employees who processed the information. Then put together a team that knew no lead Assange its profit and media prominence as the sole founder of the controversial website.
As would be expected, the author devotes several chapters to defend the American soldier Bradley Manning, accused of leaking secret documents to Wikileaks over the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Percent, documents by the irresponsible management of Assange could have endangered the lives of informants who collaborated with the U.S. government. Manning
The soldier is imprisoned awaiting a military trial in the Marine Corps Base Quantico (Virginia) charged with the capital offense of "aiding the enemy." Could face the death penalty or spend up to 52 years in prison. Berg said Domscheit know if Manning really leaked the documents to the web.
The book provides a lot of data but for me the best book is "your friend can become your worst enemy."
The book personally contains 250 pages of easy reading, particularly because its content describes the website Wikileaks editor Julian Assange and in the last two years have attracted the attention of the international press.
Yet, I finish reading it with a feeling of heaviness after learning the intricacies of the relationship between Julian Assange and the author of the book Domscheit-Berg for his "discrepancies excess Assange control and role of" demystifying a different Julian to as known in the media, at least in Latin America.
's no secret that labor relations are not easy to handle when personal egos are not controlled, particularly in pressure environments and powers as in the media.
Personally I had to survive all attacks and speculation during my short career, however, I have found that the time is responsible for putting each person in place and to clarify the situations were not handled properly.
What catches my attention Domscheit-Berg or Daniel Schmitt, "is the negative charge of energy transmitted by the book as he describes the attitudes and personality as Assange Wikileaks reveals that all is not what we wanted.
understand your need to vent, to reflect, to share with the public the truth about the security of the site and promote their project Openleaks. But this book, moves away from the concept literature, what is journalism, what is information. "This book is not it? Just gives me a lot of data under the guise of a feeling of hatred and resentment.
Like most "books" that are now published an advertising project seems "crude" that was launched at the juncture of the crisis of Wikileaks after the publications of the American diplomatic cables and submission to the Julian Assange justice.
Nevertheless, German-Berg Domscheit reveals interesting facts about foreign policy and management Wikileaks. Described by major media as "the new technology journalism." But according to the author was led by an egomaniac without scruples or ethics when it comes to managing the information received.
The author reveals the unthinkable for me: Wikileaks always lacked a reliable system for protection of sources and a structure to process thousands of documents he received. Describes the Web According
operated as follows: a source hangs his documents, Wikileaks team cleans metadata, check shipments and accompanying notes drawn on the text.
At first this did Assange Domscheit and although publicly declared that they had thousands of employees who processed the information. Then put together a team that knew no lead Assange its profit and media prominence as the sole founder of the controversial website.
As would be expected, the author devotes several chapters to defend the American soldier Bradley Manning, accused of leaking secret documents to Wikileaks over the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Percent, documents by the irresponsible management of Assange could have endangered the lives of informants who collaborated with the U.S. government. Manning
The soldier is imprisoned awaiting a military trial in the Marine Corps Base Quantico (Virginia) charged with the capital offense of "aiding the enemy." Could face the death penalty or spend up to 52 years in prison. Berg said Domscheit know if Manning really leaked the documents to the web.
The book provides a lot of data but for me the best book is "your friend can become your worst enemy."
0 comments:
Post a Comment