The Nobel acceptance speech for peace, "Somewhere today a young protester expect their government's brutality ... but she strives for justice, "Obama said referring Neda Soltan Agha, a young Iranian was killed in public by his government during demonstrations in Tehran and was videotaped and broadcast by 
mu ndo. Obama's silence about the fact the Iranian regime's crimes, the young protesters criticized the government of Obama as too pragmatic decision making.
Obama Truly one day would criticize such Iranian acts of repression, but their initial tone was idealistic to try to get a dialogue with Iran for the tension in your year continues between diplomatic dialogue and reality.
Obama's vision comes from the democratic margin militaristic Franklin Roosevelt to win a world war to get to later found the UN, but it remains the policy of multilateralism as George Bush Sr. and realistic as that of Richard Nixon which ended in an unpopular war by daring to build links with Red China.
Obama's world tour between two wars against a violent and stateless enemy does not want dialogue or negotiations, but manages ideological aspirations. So the assassination attempt on arrival in detritus off a bomb in the plane from Amsterdam Delta by the Nigerian Abdulmutalab Omar Faruk, the response to terror is a battle for national security only depends on logistics, int
eligencia and global cooperation. But the schemes are eager to nuclear weapons and Obama does not want to face, this leading a superpower that can not always depend on the sermon, but the imposition.
His pragmatic foreign policy is to achieve a new standard guide to the U.S., being seen as a leader of deliberation by the ten meetings held on security in Afghanistan to take its decision with the dispatch of 30,000 troops was announced on 1 st December at West Point, some analysis to understand democratic policy. Others meanwhile are a strategy of U.S. adversaries like Iran as a disproportionate difference to the East.
The "Obama Doctrine" which enters its second term should define its p olicy
outside under an umbrella realistic development, and resources available to agree on commitments to recognize the change in the distribution of world power in Asia, and U.S. limits, as well as address the global problem of global warming and nuclear proliferation are the most restrictive in the U.S. national interests John McCain said that "Afghanistan and Iraq are wars legacy and not easy to find their place in the Docrina Obama, but shrink diplomatic objectives to find common ground. Other analysts argue that a reduction targets for American power to redefine its foreign policy against the style of George Bush Sr. and Made laine
Director Albright says National Security Network; "There is a different century so Obama is making a difference by including the spread of global power with countries like China. India and Brazil. " Obama's return to a more traditional American foreign policy between realism and idealism would be intensified American by the war in Afghanistan and the uncertainty of the Iranian nuclear plan.
"The war consumed presidencies" recalls Bruce Riedel, former CIA officer to send a report to Obama on the situation in Afghanistan and believes that Obama has up to 24 months to prove that the war in Afgha as
can be controlled. On Iran, Obama believes in new penalties to deter the ayatollahs to build a nuclear bomb.
Throughout history few presidents transformed relations foreign multinationals, but Obama may be one challenge faced by being immersed in the swamp of Afghanistan, which could redefining U.S. relations with other world powers led by the hope of forging a better world, and if this gets to be called the "Obama Doctrine."
0 comments:
Post a Comment